CRC Research Update — September 10, 2026
Today's colorectal cancer research highlights
Curated CRC research — accessible, accurate, actionable
The CRC Digest
Thursday, September 10, 2026
IMPORTANT: The CRC Digest curates and summarizes publicly available research for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing in this newsletter constitutes medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendation. The information provided should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the guidance of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions regarding a medical condition or treatment. Content is generated with AI assistance and reviewed by the editorial team. We are not medical professionals. Individual results, treatments, and outcomes vary.
CRC Research Update
-
RESEARCH
Multicellular networks drive immunotherapy resistance in MSS colorectal cancerA review synthesizes evidence that microsatellite-stable CRC—comprising 85-90% of cases—remains refractory to PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy (objective response rate 5-10%) because tumor-associated macrophages, cancer-associated fibroblasts, regulatory T cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells cooperate to exclude, disable, and exhaust CD8+ T cells. (Front Immunol)
-
RESEARCH
Mutant KRAS drives aberrant RNA modification in colorectal cancerIn isogenic cell and animal models, mutant KRAS—present in 40-50% of CRC patients—upregulates m6A mRNA modification by stabilizing the METTL3 protein and inhibiting its degradation via p62-driven selective autophagy. (Adv Sci)
-
TREATMENT
Omitting 5-FU bolus in mCRC: survival and toxicity outcomesA retrospective multicentre cohort of 267 metastatic CRC patients compared bolus-free nbFOLFOX (n=141) with standard mFOLFOX6 (n=126), with or without bevacizumab or anti-EGFR therapy, to assess impact on progression-free survival and overall survival. (Contemp Oncol)
-
SCREENING
Two-step screening strategy shows long-term effectiveness in ChinaA cohort of 295,706 participants underwent fecal immunochemical testing or questionnaire-based risk assessment, with positive results triggering colonoscopy referral; the study estimated absolute risk reductions and numbers needed to screen for CRC incidence and mortality. (Chin J Cancer Res)
-
SCREENING
Quantitative FIT levels predict colorectal cancer risk across clinical settingsIn a retrospective cohort of 3,663 colonoscopy patients, FIT levels were significantly higher in the 567 CRC cases (2,113.90 vs 615.99 ng/ml; p < 0.001), supporting risk stratification across asymptomatic, anaemia, rectal bleeding, and other indications. (Rev Esp Enferm Dig)
Today's research spans immunotherapy resistance mechanisms, biomarker-driven biology, treatment modifications, and screening strategies across diverse CRC populations.
Get CRC research intelligence delivered weekly — free.
SubscribeCRC Digest
Not Medical Advice
The CRC Digest provides research summaries for informational and educational purposes only. This is not medical advice. Always consult your healthcare provider before making any decisions about your care.
Content is curated with AI assistance and reviewed by the editorial team.
Browse Past Issues · Read our full disclaimer · Manage subscription
Useful? Forward it to a colleague. Many of the topics named here have a live research dossier — trajectory and evidence — at Signal Bureau.
Got this from a colleague? Subscribe here — we only ever add readers who sign themselves up.
Evolution Accelerator, Inc. (dba Evolution Labs) · 3941 Park Dr., Suite 20341, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
You are receiving this because you subscribed to CRC Digest (self-serve signup)
Unsubscribe — honored promptly, no login required. · Privacy policy · Manage or delete your data