CRC Research Update — September 18, 2026
Today's colorectal cancer research highlights
Curated CRC research, accessible, accurate, actionable
The CRC Digest
Friday, September 18, 2026
IMPORTANT: The CRC Digest curates and summarizes publicly available research for informational and educational purposes only. Nothing in this newsletter constitutes medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendation. The information provided should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Always seek the guidance of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions regarding a medical condition or treatment. Content is generated with AI assistance and reviewed by the editorial team. We are not medical professionals. Individual results, treatments, and outcomes vary.
CRC Research Update
-
SCREENING
Five-year colonoscopy surveillance may be as safe as three-year intervals after high-risk polyp removalA European randomized trial compared colonoscopy at 5 years versus 3 years after removal of high-risk adenomas (≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or 3–10 adenomas), with 10-year colorectal cancer incidence as the primary endpoint. (N Engl J Med)
-
LIVING WITH CRC
Fatigue remains common five years after rectal cancer treatmentThe QoLiRECT study investigated fatigue prevalence at 5 years after rectal cancer surgery using the Piper Fatigue Scale, examining baseline characteristics and treatment-related factors as potential predictors of moderate-severe fatigue. (Acta Oncol)
-
RESEARCH
Chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy may expand checkpoint blockade benefit in mismatch repair-proficient rectal cancerAdding immune checkpoint blockade to chemoradiotherapy has been associated with pathological complete response rates of 30% or more in pMMR rectal cancer trials, higher than expected with chemoradiotherapy alone, though long-term disease control data remain early endpoints. (Ann Gastroenterol Surg)
-
SCREENING
Rural and Appalachian communities face geographic barriers to colonoscopy accessA national geospatial analysis of all contiguous US census tracts quantified colonoscopy provider access and screening prevalence, comparing rural-urban and Appalachian-non-Appalachian regions where CRC incidence and mortality are disproportionately high. (Prev Chronic Dis)
This week's research spans surveillance intervals, long-term survivorship, and efforts to extend immunotherapy benefit beyond MSI-H disease.
Get CRC research intelligence delivered weekly, free.
SubscribeCRC Digest
Not Medical Advice
The CRC Digest provides research summaries for informational and educational purposes only. This is not medical advice. Always consult your healthcare provider before making any decisions about your care.
Content is curated with AI assistance and reviewed by the editorial team.
Browse Past Issues · Read our full disclaimer · Manage subscription
Useful? Forward it to a colleague. Many of the topics named here have a live research dossier, trajectory and evidence, at Signal Bureau.
Got this from a colleague? Subscribe here. We only ever add readers who sign themselves up.
Evolution Accelerator, Inc. (dba Evolution Labs) · 3941 Park Dr., Suite 20341, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
You are receiving this because you subscribed to CRC Digest (self-serve signup)
Unsubscribe: honored promptly, no login required. · Privacy policy · Manage or delete your data